12
responses
Share Article:
Shutter Island (Review)

Shutter Island (Review)

good old-fashioned movie magic
By
Feb 18, 2010
Our Rating:
Your Rating:
click to rate!
VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
3.9/5
(34 votes)
Shutter Island
Genre: Drama, Mystery, Thriller Release Date: 18/02/2010 Runtime: 138 minutes Country: USA

----

Director:   Writer(s): 
Laeta Kalogridis

Dennis Lehane

Cast: , , , , ,
Shutter Island (Review), reviewed by Anders Wotzke on 2010-02-18T17:22:41+00:00 rating 4.0 out of5

Think of Shutter Island — the much anticipated mystery/thriller from movie master Martin Scorsese (Raging Bull, The Departed) — as the act of a master stage magician slightly past his prime.  His production values are top notch, and the performances of his stage hands make for great diversions, but his technique isn’t as refined as it used to be.  His sleight of hand isn’t so ‘slight’ anymore. We therefore catch him in the act of deception, and before he has time to finish the trick, we’ve sussed it all out.

But the magic isn’t lost. Against all odds, Shutter Island remains a good, borderline great, film purely because Scorsese still knows how to put on one hell of a show. The visual grandeur, pitch-perfect tenor and captivating performances is more than enough to keep the film in sailable waters, despite the often clumsy plotting. Still, it’s a shame that there is a problem at all, considering  Dennis Lehane’s mind-mulling story is brimming with great characters and clever concepts. The issue comes lies with the clunky way in which it has been adapted to the screen, where  information is fed to the audience in blatant chunks of exposition, making it almost impossible not to notice the trickery being conducted.

Leonardo DiCaprio stars as Teddy Daniels, a US Marshall assigned to help investigate the whereabouts of a missing patient from the psychiatric hospital on Shutter Island. Surrounded almost entirely by a perilous cliff face and with only one way in or out, the fictitious island situated off of America’s east coast is the perfect location for an insane asylum, and for that matter, a 50s-styled horror movie.  With the help of his new partner Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo), Teddy starts asking around only to find straight answers hard to come by, particularly from the institute’s chief physician Dr. Cawley (Ben Kingsley), who claims his methods of rehabilitation to be of a calming and nurturing nature.

Teddy doesn’t buy it. If there’s anything the Second World War taught him as a soldier – which we see in stunningly recreated flashbacks and creepy dream sequences — it’s that people are inherently brutal. He’s convinced there’s something much more sinister happening on the island, and although a Category 5 hurricane looms, he’s determined to get to the bottom of it.

While the plot tends to thrash about like it has been unwillingly strapped in a straight jacket, Shutter Island remains entirely  absorbing for one key reason; atmosphere. From  the immaculately dressed sets, amalgamation of eerie locations, cleverly manipulated lighting and a score that reverberates through your skull with nothing less than the sound of pure doom, the film is engulfed in such a ominous atmosphere, it just about seeps off the screen. In the same way Stanley Kubrick brought to life the isolated hotel setting in The Shining, Scorsese has constructed the imagined isle with great attention to detail and an acute awareness of space.  Grand set pieces are favoured over digital environments, lending a  fantastic tangibility to the setting often missing from digital-heavy films.  It makes for a deeply immersive experience, and much like the Overlook Hotel from Kubrick’s film, you never once feel at ease being on Shutter Island, which is how the film manages to keep you on the edge of your seat for over two hours.

shutter island011 Shutter Island (Review)

Having cast DiCaprio in no less than four films, Scorsese knows exactly how to get the performance he wants out of the maturing actor in a role you wouldn’t normally associate him with.  Teddy is a deceivingly complex character, with a great big chip on his shoulder, and it’s really a credit to DiCaprio’s talent that he pulls it off so convincingly.  The 35 year old actor still has that Titanic glint in his eye that marks him as a man of passion, compelling us to follow him head-first on his downward spiral into the deepest and darkest secrets of the Island. Just as perfectly cast is Mark Ruffalo as Teddy’s agreeably soothing partner and Ben Kingsley as the politely spoken chief doctor, who unnerves in a ‘can’t-put-my-finger-on-it’ kind of way. Elsewhere, Patricia Clarkson, Emily Mortimer and Jackie Earle Haley all have a memorable impact in their brief but vital roles, which to discuss in any detail would spoil the mystery.

Chances are, though, you’ll spoil it for yourself, probably before the 20 minute mark if you’re a genre buff.  It was never going to be easy for screenwriter Laeta Kalogridis to adapt a film with such a twisted agenda, especially since The Sixth Sense fooled us back in 1999 and consequently made us more aware moviegoers.  But subtly in deception is the key here, and there’s not quite enough of it. What there’s an abundance of, however, is good ol’ fashioned movie magic, where the fun is not in how it ends, but in the journey getting there.

Follow the author Anders Wotzke on Twitter.

  • http://wondersinthedark.wordpress.com/ Sam Juliano

    Yes indeed Anders! This was exceedingly entertaining film that for one used weather to externalize events and to play out a riveting narrative amidst some hair raising atmospherics. Some superlative scenes in a cave, at a lighthouse, in a caferia and in a cemetary burial vault all contributed to the fun, and Di Caprio delivers an impressive turn, as does Clarkson, Haley et al. I had no issue with the ending, and loved the Dachau concentration camp flashback structure. Excellent review here.

  • http://cutprintreview.com Anders

    Thanks for the comment Sam! Despite some structural flaws, it was still highly entertaining as you said, which is a lot more than you can say about most films with a similar runtime.

  • Charlie

    Good movie fun edge of your seat but the ending while some people may like the ending i thought this movie did not need such a twist in the end it had so many directions and just to drop off them and go the way they went i thought to be, well insane. Still loved the movie though.

  • TIm

    loved the entire movie and the twist was the thing that mad it. however i hated how he recessed again and was marched off to the lighthouse, unnecessary and left you feeling somewhat… cold.

  • http://cutprintreview.com Anders

    Very true, Tim. The exposition-heavy ending did feel overlong and blunted the impact of the film by the time you left the cinema. That said, I certainly walked out with the feeling I'd seen a otherwise well crafted and entertaining film. No question.

  • Fiona

    I loved this movie both times that I watched it. I watched it as a completely different story the second time and was fascinated how differently the characters presented themselves and affected me. It's a 'must see twice' kind of movie.

  • Pingback: Inception (Review) | Cut Print Review

  • Pingback: The Ghost Writer (Review) | Cut Print Review

  • Pingback: facebook123

  • Pingback: eu textile news

  • Pingback: garment news daily

  • Pingback: best uk casino