6
responses
Share Article:
Tomorrow, When The War Began (Film Review)

Tomorrow, When The War Began (Film Review)

It's Hollywood, only smeared in Vegemite
By
Aug 15, 2010
Our Rating:
Your Rating:
click to rate!
VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
4.3/5
(135 votes)
Tomorrow, When the War Began
Genre: Action, Adventure, Drama Release Date: 02/09/2010 Runtime: 103 minutes Country: Australia

----

Director:   Writer(s): 
John Marsden

Stuart Beattie

Cast: , , , , ,
Tomorrow, When The War Began (Film Review), reviewed by Anders Wotzke on 2010-08-15T23:46:34+00:00 rating 3.0 out of5

Ask a group of Australian teens to name one home-grown movie they’ve seen at the cinema in the last few years and you’ll likely receive a bunch of blank looks. And that’s hardly the result of ignorance. For reasons likely relating to budgetary constraints, our film industry tends not produce anything for younger action-craving demographics, which is a real shame considering how lucrative that market can be.

While far from perfect, Tomorrow, When the War Began deserves kudos simply for filling that void. Based on the immensely popular teen fiction novels by Australian author John Marsden, this action-packed directorial debut from screenwriter Stuart Beattie — best known for co-writing the Pirates of the Caribbean series — follows a group of teenagers as they struggle to survive in the wake of a shock invasion of Australia.

** Read our exclusive interview with stars Caitlin Stasey (Ellie) and Deniz Akdeniz (Homer) here! **

Tomorrow is our answer to the Hollywood blockbuster, boasting an attractive young cast, thrilling action set pieces, impressive special effects, and — just in case you start to think you are watching a Hollywood film — a scene where Vegemite is devoured straight from the jar. Next to riding Skippy to school, that’s about as Aussie as it gets.

But as is the case with most films dedicated to appeasing short attention spans, Tomorrow struggles to register on an emotional level. What was both a fascinating and frightening “what if?” scenario in Marsden’s novel is merely an excuse for repeat explosions in Beattie’s film, losing much of its intensity to far-fetched plotting and histrionic direction.

The film begins breezily when seven high school friends from a small country community decide to go on a camping trip to escape civilization (which is defined nowadays as being without mobile phone reception).   Each of the characters are prominently defined; there’s Ellie (Caitlin Stasey) the determined leader, Corrie (Rachel Hurd-Wood) her gossiping BFF, Kevin (Lincoln Lewis) the football jock, Fiona (Phoebe Tonkin) the prissy beauty queen, Robyn (Ashleigh Cummings) the staunch Christian, Homer the immature prankster and Lee (Chris Pang) the reticent son of Thai immigrants.

While sleeping under the stars, the group is awoken by dozens of military planes flying overhead, yet it’s only when they return to their eerily deserted homes that they realise the reality of the situation; Australia, for reasons unknown, has been invaded by foreign forces. Ellie and her friends come to the conclusion that if they want to survive the war, they’ll have to stop acting like kids and start thinking like soldiers.

when the war began021 e1281880986128 600x292 Tomorrow, When The War Began (Film Review)

Witnessing these teenagers forcedly mature in the face of adversity is an intriguing subtext somewhat spoilt by Beattie’s clumsy screenplay, where characters tend to verbalise exactly what they’re feeling rather than allowing for the actors to simply portray it. It’s a disservice to the performances that are generally quite solid, particularly for a young and relatively inexperienced cast. Ex-Neighbours star Caitlin Stasey has a strong screen presence as Ellie, exhibiting some impressive range as the headstrong protagonist. Stasey occasionally narrates the story in attempt to bring Ellie’s first-person perspective from the book to the screen, but it’s so feebly implemented that it really shouldn’t have made the final cut.

Up-and-coming Aussies Deniz Akdeniz and Ashleigh Cummings are also commendable in their roles, each clearly in sync with the nature of their characters. In fact, the only real disappointment comes by way of newcomer Chris Pang as Ellie’s love interest Lee. His dialogue is unconvincingly delivered and his presence on screen borders on awkward.

Ultimately, it’s hard not to feel slightly disappointed by what could have been a more nuanced look at how today’s teenagers respond to life-or-death situations, especially when you find yourself chuckling at scenes asking to be taken seriously. That being said, Tomorrow, When the War Began should equally be applauded for its ambitious Hollywood scale, featuring some of the most explosive action sequences to come out of our industry in years. This is a film made for teens, and it’s important to remember that while watching. It’s just a shame that those who first grew up with Marsden’s books are now of an age where they prefer their drama with less pulp and more polish.

Follow the author Anders Wotzke on Twitter.

  • Pingback: Interview: Caitlin Stasey & Deniz Akdeniz of TOMORROW, WHEN THE WAR BEGAN | Cut Print Review

  • dowdy17

    I went to see this movie a few nights ago and i was extremely dissapointed. I am a big fan of the novel and the entire series, although i prefer the first three books. John Marsden was excellent at drawing you into the story and its environment and you truly sympathise and fear for the safety of the main characters due to their uniqueness, sincerity and determination to survive. Over the course of the series, but particularly the first novel, you get to learn more and more about each character and the relationships between the group, as they change, intertwine and progress through the story. It has alot of action yes but its a CHARACTER driven story. All the action elements are carefully planned out by the group and are formed according to the opinions and limitations of every individual, hence you learn how a group of teenagers are able to accomplish such dangerous tasks. The action in the movie was flashy and nothing new. The movie was also extremely poor and cliched at establishing characters, with a “suspect line-up” introduction of each teenager with an overblown simplistic joke. And the movie ends with a feeling of almost zero change amongst the group, a kiss and a cuddle here and there. Weak. Casting/acting was a little unconvincing and dialogue was pretty bad, not at all revealing how each character has to overcome personal battles with morality and friendship. I think Homer and Lee were probably the most accurate depictions from the novel. But, I never remember the story drawing any attention to Fi’s rockin body for Homer to have a perve at. He was attracted to her sincerity and her naivety from what i remember. And the “joint-smoking”, unbelievably cliched, ape-like Chris from the film was a deep, poetic and introverted character in the novel, who formed a unique friendship with Ellie based on their mutual love of poetry, art and the beauty of the natural world. The movie was plagued by way too many attempts of humor, at the most ridiculous moments of suspense, which never happened in the novel. None of the characters ever let their guard down in danger. There’s even a minor break in the 4th wall joke when Ellie asks Robyn if the book she’s reading is better than the film. I was so shocked and bewildered at the inappropriateness of the line that i laughed out loud, drowning out the reply to the line. I wish i knew what her answer was. A tiny part of me was still really excited to see one of my favorite stories up on the big screen, but the rest of me was, as you can tell, a little disappointed.

    • http://cutprintreview.com Anders

      Thanks for the insightful comment, dowdy17. While my memory of the novel is hazy, you clearly know the books back to front! I’m glad I wasn’t the only one slightly disappointed by the characterisation and overwrought drama. I also agree that the “book is better than the film” comment was poorly implemented. Really tacky.

    • mullykid

      I agree dowdy17. I beleive the movie didnt draw out enough of the true emotions between the characters, and they didnt complete the story line. From my memory the blowing up of the bridge happened about 3/4 of the way through the book, where in the movie that was the ending. I was also very dissapointed in the way the movie didnt really seem to capture me as the book did. The book seemed to just keep drawing me in to the point that putting it down felt wrong. The movie however didnt really capture me at all. However the director of the movie did do a good job in my opinion, i think he just really needed to try and embrace the real meaning of the story more.

  • Lalla

    You’s are gay!

  • Pingback: facebook123