3
responses
Share Article:
Coraline 3D (Review)

Coraline 3D (Review)

Where perfection is limited and the reality is real
By
Aug 4, 2009
Our Rating:
Your Rating:
click to rate!
VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
5.0/5
(4 votes)
Coraline
Genre: Animation, Adventure, Family Release Date: 06/08/2009 Runtime: 100 minutes Country: USA

----

Director:   Writer(s): 
Henry Selick

Neil Gaiman

Cast: , , , , ,
Coraline 3D (Review), reviewed by Katina Vangopoulos on 2009-08-04T18:04:26+00:00 rating 3.5 out of5

The story of Coraline and her fantastical adventures is momentous – but not only because it’s the latest project from The Nightmare Before Christmas director Henry Selick. The film breaks a lot of milestones: at 100 minutes it’s the longest stop-motion feature ever, and the first to be shot entirely in 3D. Not to mention it’s the first venture from animation company LAIKA, and boy do they have big expectations riding on their shoulders with this one. But with the stunning visual experience that comes as we’re taken between what our heroine has and what she thinks she wants, it’s just not the animated masterpiece many were hoping for.

Easy on the eyes through the increasingly familiar glasses, Coraline gives a whimsical feeling of excitement and anticipation. The 3D technique is a triumph as the extra dimension propels you head-first into the story; Coraline’s first discovery of the tunnel connecting her two worlds is particularly beautiful. What’s amazing about stop-motion, when done well, is the intricate detail within the mise-en-scene – strangely enough, nothing is left to the imagination when it comes to the brand of the car or leftover cheese crumbs. That’s reserved for the story itself, full of colour when Coraline discovers her ultimate world and the ‘other parents’ that come with it. The film picks up at this point, where what unfolds leads to the ultimate climax – one of Coraline’s weaknesses is the inconsistent pace which comes and goes throughout the film. It’s disappointing because when it’s good, it’s dark and brooding; or menacing, as the OFLC have labelled it. While these scenes sit side by side with lighter moments, Selick’s ventures surround the darker side of the psyche and it’s great to watch. His version of Coraline’s story (taken from Neil Gaiman’s children’s book) is not for anyone wanting an Ice Age or a Snow White and it intends on delivering messages relevant to adult audiences. With themes of materialism and drawing on the ‘eyes-as-windows-to-the-soul’ theory, Selick’s message isn’t lost in the vessel of a child and refuses to tie every loose end without doubt.

coraline movie image  2  445x2671 Coraline 3D (Review)

Coraline, as a girl who’s forced to adapt to a new home, is voiced nicely by Dakota Fanning who doesn’t sound her 15 years. She brings the right kind of enchantment to the role, and it’s obvious because of the wonderful facial expressions caught on screen (that make the characters feel so real). Teri Hatcher delivers with promise as Mom and the Other Mother; they are different characters, while genuine feelings go to the impromptu sidekick with animation’s weirdest name: Wybie (voiced by Robert Bailey Jr). Also of note are Absolutely Fabulous duo Jennifer Saunders and Dawn French, who reunite to provide the less tasteful moments of the film. While the impressive voice cast serve the film well, collectively they don’t raise Coraline to great heights. What prevents this from being the Wall-E of 2009 is the lack of exciting action from the get-go and the increasing impression of how long a drawn-out affair it feels.

Verdict

Coraline’s a bit of a mixed bag – kids can enjoy this but they’re not the primary target. Adults can read a lot into it but the pace disallows total immersion in the story. However, there’s no denying the beautiful and effective result of the Real 3D technology.

[Rating: 3.5/5]

Follow the author Katina Vangopoulos on Twitter.

  • Tim Magee

    A disturbing movie, also intriguing. In watching it with my daughter she clearly disn’t understand the consequences other than at a story level. Parents undoubtedly receive a different impact not having the nieve filter in place. Intriguing in that the content will take me some time to evaluate. Many concepts are transferred by viewer infernce rather than direct presentation (that is the intriguing part). With Tim Burton’s architcture the story leverages all angles to amplify the concepts. Sadly some scenes were effective in what they were lacking. That is probably my biggest issue. The clear lack of love from the real parents is disturbing. Too much lacking in my opinion to make that point. The choice was very clear given the portrayal of the real parents. Even when all is reconciled in the young girls world the parents still come accross to be cold and disconnected. In some way I see two bad worlds, only one is worse, so to me no winner is achieved, just the result of a dilemma (the least bad result was achieved). Still in shock and trying to comprehend the engineering on this one, but I am clearly affected. At the end of the movie I was definitely in a worse place emotionally than at the beginning. Did I like it….if I had to choose now I would say no, but I’d prefer not to reconvene the jury until it sets in more.

  • Pingback: textile industry news

  • Pingback: garment daily business reports